Example of SEO through blogging and content generation using Feature Snippet Rules, Rich Snippet Rules, Schema, Data Structured defined by Google For Search Engine Optimization Rules and Guides:
Improved from 144 organic clicks per day to 992 organic clicks in 3 months
Blog Posts at: https://www.lacitycars.com/blog/all-blog-post/
Proof of Original Blogs:
All content is created with proprietary AI and proprietary instructions to AI.
A Noble and Virtuous Endeavor
Is this pursuit noble, virtuous, and beneficial to society? Absolutely. AI has the power to sift through vast amounts of information and present the most relevant, well-structured summaries of what exists on the internet. While some still prefer Yahoo over Google, the key takeaway is that there’s always room for improvement in how we access and process information. Offering results that are even more precise and insightful than what Google provides doesn’t just refine search—it enhances understanding, decision-making, and knowledge-sharing on a global scale.
AI is more than just a tool for convenience; it’s a transformative force for good. It democratizes knowledge, making complex information more accessible to everyone, regardless of expertise or background. It helps scientists accelerate breakthroughs, supports educators in personalizing learning, and assists doctors in diagnosing diseases faster and more accurately. The real power of AI lies in its ability to empower individuals, solve real-world problems, and drive progress in ways that were once unimaginable.
When I was in 11th grade, we were supposed to learn how to use a slide rule. For those unfamiliar, a slide rule was the equivalent of a calculator but far more difficult to master. It required precision, patience, and a deep understanding of logarithmic functions just to perform basic calculations. One day, our math teacher walked into the classroom and said, “No need for the slide rule. Go buy an HP calculator.” Just like that, a tool that had been essential for decades was replaced by something faster, easier, and more efficient.
Did the calculator stop students from learning multiplication or weaken their mathematical ability? Not at all. Last time I checked, we still give Phd to math students. Don’t we? Calculator freed us from tedious manual calculations and allowed us to focus on deeper problem-solving and critical thinking. Does AI stop students from learning how to write? Not at all! For those who want to exercise their creative writing, AI cannot be a hinderance. If you have the creative writing talent, you will use it and no one should be scared of AI. AI will not hinder or stop someone who will write the next Huckleberry Finn or The Count of Monte Cristo. It is like to say a singer will not sing if there is AI!
AI today is no different from what the calculator was in 1977. It’s a tool that enhances human capability rather than replaces it. Those who resist it, clinging to outdated methods out of fear or nostalgia, will inevitably fall behind. The real challenge isn’t whether AI should be used—it’s how we integrate it wisely to amplify human intelligence rather than limit it.
Does Google not index or make AI blogs less valuable? Absolutely not. Google says we don’t care how the content was created.
Please see:
https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/02/google-search-and-ai-content
Besides, look at our screenshot. Again, if we do not produce organic clicks, we will refund you fully.
Let me inject an interesting fact
It is now widely recognized in the SEO world that Google prioritizes engagement over backlinks when ranking websites. What does this mean? Simply put, if your website or landing page keeps visitors interested and engaged, it’s far more likely to rank on the first page for its main keywords. But how does Google determine engagement? The truth is, Google has been using AI for over a decade to analyze user behavior—measuring time on page, interactions, and overall satisfaction. How else?
Now, here’s the key question: if Google relies on AI to assess engagement, how can it penalize AI-generated content? It wouldn’t make sense for a search engine driven by AI to punish content created with the very technology it uses to rank pages. The real issue isn’t AI content itself but whether the content is valuable, engaging, and useful to users. In the end, it’s not about who—or what—writes the content, but whether it truly resonates with the audience. Image below is created by AI:
Headline: 8 major newspapers join legal backlash against OpenAI, Microsoft.The Chicago Tribune, New York Daily News, South Florida’s Sun Sentinel, the Denver Post, Orange County (Calif.) Register, San Jose Mercury News, Orlando Sentinel and St. Paul Pioneer Press. If AI is John Doe,
Let’s pause to reflect on a pressing question in today’s deeply divided society: who is truly responsible for the intense polarization tearing at the fabric of our country? While many factors play a role, a significant portion of the blame must be placed on the media—especially the most influential and extreme voices on both sides of the political spectrum. Personalities like Rachel Maddow on the left and Tucker Carlson on the right, as well as others such as Keith Olbermann and Sean Hannity, do far more than report the news—they often project a personal, deep-seated hatred for those who hold opposing views.
This animosity frequently goes beyond mere political disagreement. It sometimes seems rooted in genuine personal disdain, without any apparent substantive reason other than to vilify the “other side.” This hostile approach is then amplified and intensified because it draws attention and ratings. In other words, it’s not just about political analysis or commentary—it’s about stoking fear, anger, and resentment in their audiences, often at the expense of honest discourse. This emotional, confrontational style feeds a cycle where audiences become more entrenched in their beliefs and less willing to listen or engage with opposing perspectives.
Given that roughly 80% of people rely heavily on these media figures for their political information, the impact of this personal and intense antagonism cannot be overstated. It fuels division, suspicion, and mistrust among the public, further widening the ideological gap.
The rise of this phenomenon didn’t happen overnight. It traces back decades to trailblazers like Rush Limbaugh, who pioneered the use of highly partisan, emotionally charged rhetoric to capture and maintain a loyal audience. Limbaugh’s success showed that inflaming passions and stoking outrage could be both highly profitable and politically powerful. This model has since been adopted and intensified on television and digital platforms, where the battle for viewers’ attention often rewards the loudest and most extreme voices.
While media figures operate within a larger context of social, economic, and political pressures, their choices in rhetoric and tone are deliberate. By choosing to promote hostility and personal disdain rather than respectful disagreement, these extreme media personalities contribute significantly to the polarized environment we face today.
Therefore, there is a strong case for removing or significantly limiting the influence of figures like Maddow and Carlson. Doing so could reduce the toxic animosity in public discourse and open the door for more balanced, reasoned conversations. Without their constant, personal attacks and divisive rhetoric driving the narrative, political polarization might ease, creating opportunities for more meaningful engagement and understanding across ideological lines.
This concern echoes the lessons of the classic film Meet John Doe, released more than 70 years ago. The movie explored how media manipulation and the power of influential voices shape public opinion and societal narratives—messages that remain painfully relevant. It reminds us that the media’s role carries great responsibility: it can either unite or divide, depending on how it chooses to wield its influence.
Today, as polarization reaches new heights, Meet John Doe offers a vital warning. Media figures must move beyond personal hatred and the race for ratings to foster honest, constructive dialogue. Removing or curbing the platforms of those who thrive on personal animosity is not about censorship—it is about restoring a media landscape where respect and reason guide public conversation, a necessary step to healing the divisions within our democracy.
….
I am scoring over 90%. Here are several examples from yesterday test run:
https://www.iconocast.com/blog/sound-design-in-immersive-theater-experiences/
https://www.iconocast.com/blog/comparing-analog-and-digital-recording/
https://www.iconocast.com/blog/how-national-anthems-shape-identity/
https://www.iconocast.com/blog/exploring-the-roots-of-flamenco-music/
Results:
